Monday, September 15, 2008

Barack Obama inflates his resume!


It has been noted by Charles Krauthammer and others that very few people have stepped forward to vouch for Barack Obama.
Indeed, there would seem to be an especially conspicuous absence of witnesses to the years after graduated from Columbia and before he moved to Chicago to work as a community organizer.
Well, it turns out that one of his co-workers has in fact written about Mr. Obama during those days. And while he is an admitted fan of Obama’s, he claims that he has inflated his resume considerably.
Others who worked with Obama at Business International have subsequently chimed in.
First, Mr. Obama’s version as presented in from Dreams From My Father, pp 55-6:

CHAPTER SEVEN

"… And so, in the months leading up to graduation, I wrote to every civil rights organization I could think of, to any black elected official in the country with a progressive agenda, to neighborhood councils and tenant rights groups. When no one wrote back, I wasn’t discouraged. I decided to find more conventional work for a year, to pay off my student loans and maybe even save a little bit. I would need the money later, I told myself. Organizers didn’t make any money; their poverty was proof of their integrity.
Eventually a consulting house to multinational corporations agreed to hire me as a research assistant. Like a spy behind enemy lines, I arrived every day at my mid-Manhattan office and sat at my computer terminal, checking the Reuters machine that blinked bright emerald messages from across the globe. As far as I could tell I was the only black man in the company, a source of shame for me but a source of considerable pride for the company’s secretarial pool. They treated me like a son, those black ladies; they told me how they expected me to run the company one day…
Nevertheless, as the months passed, I felt the idea of becoming an organizer slipping away from me. The company promoted me to the position of financial writer. I had my own office, my own secretary, money in the bank. Sometimes, coming out of an interview with Japanese financiers or German bond traders, I would catch my reflection in the elevator doors-see myself in a suit and tie, a briefcase in my hand-and for a split second I would imagine myself as a captain of industry, barking out orders, closing the deal, before I remembered who it was that I had told myself I wanted to be and felt pangs of guilt for my lack of resolve.
Then one day, as I sat down at my computer to write an article on interest-rate swaps, something unexpected happened. Auma called. I had never met this half sister; we had written only intermittently…
[A] few months after Auma called, I turned in my resignation at the consulting firm and began looking in earnest for an organizing job…"
We are supposed to believe that “something happened” and the rest is history.
Here, however, is a somewhat different perspective on Obama’s halcyon days as a “spy behind enemy lines,” from a site called Analyze This:
Barack Obama Embellishes His Resume
July 9th, 2005
Dan Armstrong
Don’t get me wrong - I’m a big fan of Barack Obama, the Illinois freshman senator and hot young Democratic Party star. But after reading his autobiography, I have to say that Barack engages in some serious exaggeration when he describes a job that he held in the mid-1980s.
I know because I sat down the hall from him, in the same department, and worked closely with his boss. I can’t say I was particularly close to Barack - he was reserved and distant towards all of his co-workers - but I was probably as close to him as anyone. I certainly know what he did there, and it bears only a loose resemblance to what he wrote in his book.
Here’s Barack’s account:

"Eventually a consulting house to multinational corporations agreed to hire me as a research assistant. Like a spy behind enemy lines, I arrived every day at my mid-Manhattan office and sat at my computer terminal, checking the Reuters machine that blinked bright emerald messages from across the globe. As far as I could tell I was the only black man in the company, a source of shame for me but a source of considerable pride for the company’s secretarial pool."
First, it wasn’t a consulting house; it was a small company that published newsletters on international business. Like most newsletter publishers, it was a bit of a sweatshop. I’m sure we all wished that we were high-priced consultants to multinational corporations. But we also enjoyed coming in at ten, wearing jeans to work, flirting with our co-workers, partying when we stayed late, and bonding over the low salaries and heavy workload.
Barack worked on one of the company’s reference publications. Each month customers got a new set of pages on business conditions in a particular country, punched to fit into a three-ring binder. Barack’s job was to get copy from the country correspondents and edit it so that it fit into a standard outline. There was probably some research involved as well, since correspondents usually don’t send exactly what you ask for, and you can’t always decipher their copy. But essentially the job was copyediting.
It’s also not true that Barack was the only black man in the company. He was the only black professional man. Fred was an African-American who worked in the mailroom with his son. My boss and I used to join them on Friday afternoons to drink beer behind the stacks of office supplies. That’s not the kind of thing that Barack would do. Like I said, he was somewhat aloof.
"… as the months passed, I felt the idea of becoming an organizer slipping away from me. The company promoted me to the position of financial writer. I had my own office, my own secretary; money in the bank. Sometimes, coming out of an interview with Japanese financiers or German bond traders, I would catch my reflection in the elevator doors—see myself in a suit and tie, a briefcase in my hand—and for a split second I would imagine myself as a captain of industry, barking out orders, closing the deal, before I remembered who it was that I had told myself I wanted to be and felt pangs of guilt for my lack of resolve."
If Barack was promoted, his new job responsibilities were more of the same - rewriting other people’s copy. As far as I know, he always had a small office, and the idea that he had a secretary is laughable. Only the company president had a secretary. Barack never left the office, never wore a tie, and had neither reason nor opportunity to interview Japanese financiers or German bond traders.
"Then one day, as I sat down at my computer to write an article on interest-rate swaps, something unexpected happened…. I had never met this half sister; we had written only intermittently. …[several pages on his suffering half-sister] …a few months after Auma called, I turned in my resignation at the consulting firm and began looking in earnest for an organizing job."

What Barack means here is that he got copy from a correspondent who didn’t understand interest rate swaps, and he was trying to make sense out of it.
All of Barack’s embellishment serves a larger narrative purpose: to retell the story of the Christ’s temptation. The young, idealistic, would-be community organizer gets a nice suit, joins a consulting house, starts hanging out with investment bankers, and barely escapes moving into the big mansion with the white folks. Luckily, an angel calls, awakens his conscience, and helps him choose instead to fight for the people.
Like I said, I’m a fan. His famous keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention moved me to tears. The Democrats - not to mention America - need a mixed-race spokesperson who can connect to both urban blacks and rural whites, who has the credibility to challenge the status quo on issues ranging from misogynistic rap to unfair school funding.
And yet I’m disappointed. Barack’s story may be true, but many of the facts are not. His larger narrative purpose requires him to embellish his role. I don’t buy it. Just as I can’t be inspired by Steve Jobs now that I know how dishonest he is, I can’t listen uncritically to Barack Obama now that I know he’s willing to bend the facts to his purpose.
Once, when I applied for a marketing job at a big accounting firm, my then-supervisor called HR to say that I had exaggerated something on my resume. I didn’t agree, but I also didn’t get the job. But when Barack Obama invents facts in a book ranked No. 8 on the NY Times nonfiction list, it not only fails to be noticed but it helps elevate him into the national political pantheon.
As Mr. Armstrong suggests, if Obama would exaggerate about such things as this, what else has he exaggerated or made up out of whole cloth?
The comments to this post are also quite intriguing:
Comment from Bill Millar
Time: October 30, 2007, 8:17 am

The thing is, I worked next to Barack nearly every day he was at Business International–on many days angling for possession of the best Wang word processing terminal.
I had MANY discussions with Barack.
I can tell you this: even though I was an assistant editor (big doings at this “consulting firm”) and he was, well, he was doing something there, he certainly treated me like something less than an equal.
Funny thing… A journalism/political science major… Writing about finance… Pretending in his book to be an expert on interest rate swaps.
I remember trying to explain the nuance of these instruments to him in the cramped three Wang terminal space we called the bull pen. In contrast to his his liberal arts background, I had a degree in finance and Wall Street experience, so I knew what I was talking about.
But rather than learn from a City College kid, the Ivy Leaguer just sort of rolled his eyes. Condescendingly. I’ll never forget it. God forbid he leave the impression that a mere editor like myself knew more about something than did Barack.
He was like that…
But know what? I can forgive him for being immature–which is probably all that was at the time. Don’t we all believe we know everything at just around that age?
That said…he was a lot older when he wrote his book. Mature enough by this time to realize that his account of his time at Business International could be described as embellishment…
By the way, there should be no doubt as to Mr. Armstrong’s bona fides on this subject. Even the New York Times has
cited him as an authority for an article on this period of Mr. Obama’s storied life.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well, of course Obama's a liar. He's a politician! However, this commentary is ridiculous. You're going to tell me with a straight face that the guy who used to booze up in the office remembers anything from 25 years ago? Silly and obvious fantasy. Shoot, I barely remember the people I worked with 5 years ago! These are probably the same people who wrote a book criticizing John Kerry for actually fighting in Viet Nam and earning the Purple Heart. I'm finding these kinds of posts more comical by the minute...Matt.

Bill's Waste of Air said...

So boozing now makes one not an expert or at least one who might have witnessed things?

If that is so then a certain Mass. senator has spent about 40 years being a poor witness and or expert.

As for Kerry and his purple heart, well, my uncle got one of those, he fell in the commode.
Purple hearts are sort of a "thanks for showing up" award.
John Kerry will never come close to being a War Veteran in the same vein as John McCain.

Finally, you have figured out that I am a comic. ALL OF MY POSTS ARE COMICAL.

Anonymous said...

Really? So now the Purple Heart has no value? McCain suffered greatly and nobody is denying that he is a hero for what he endured. But, John Kerry went over there and fought just the same and I think he deserves his credit. Falling in a commode and getting shot and shot at are very different. I'm not asking you to respect the man, but respect his patriotism That's it. I know a great many vets who would string you up for calling the Purple Heart a "thanks for showing up award". That's actually the most insulting thing I've ever seen on this site.
As for the Obama stuff, the criticism is becoming tiresome because what you should be doing is attacking his policies, not his inflated resume--that's too easy. And, trust me, these drunken jackals "remembering" their coworker from 25 years ago is a joke. As is Teddy--also too easy a target. Why are you so critical of Democrats when Republicans are just as silly. Dare we mention a certain Charlie Wilson, booze, hookers, and blow?
Matt.

Anonymous said...

Also, I find it fascinating that you now take what the NYT says about Obama as acceptable when I hear rumblings about it being a liberal rag in previous posts. And, Charles Krauthammer has made no secret of his conservative political platform. What makes Mr. Armstrong the expert on Obama? There is no proof of anything other than saying that the NYT says so. That's not documentation!
Also, my grandfather was horrified that you would belittle his Purple Heart with such a glib comment...Matt.

Bill's Waste of Air said...

Well tell Gramps I said, "have a nice day, really".
You know what I was talking about and now your are just being obtuse.

Comparing John Kerry's Purple Heart to John McCain's is silly.
Both deserved that and more.

My point was, John Kerry exagerrated just a tad now didn't he?
Or was that all just "swift boating"?
By the way, when did "swift boating" become an adjective?

Matt, you disparage the author of the article as a "drunk" for 25 years ago. That is stretching things just a bit isn't it?
You might have a memory problem, I KNOW I do, but this man may not.
Why can't libs just take the good with the bad? I am able to.
I will again ask you the same question, since you seem to think I am ducking one, I think you are too: what is the TRUTH?
You claim to be the debunker of lies, so what is the TRUTH?