This is from the wonderful website 54 40 or Fight and is written by Eric Shierman. I thought it was worth posting on my blog as well especially since the writer acknowledges some VERY important points which are in bold italics, highlighted and underlined by me). My thoughts are at the bottom of the article.
GUEST POST: Do the district conventions reflect what Oregon Republicans Want to be?
From 54 40 or Fight Oregon Media Watchdog guest editorial
At 9:00am when these conventions convened, it became immediately
clear that all the rumors were wrong. These PCPs did not engage in
delaying tactics. These well mannered folks simply showed up to vote for
like minded Republicans running for internal positions in their own
party. They did not break any rules. They just turned out in what Jeff
Smith claims was somewhere between 40%-45% of the credentialed voters at
each convention, a controlling stake in any organizational election
from a shareholders’ meeting to a school body deciding a homecoming
queen.
Who are they? It would be a mistake to call them Ron Paul supporters,
because they all understand that Dr. Paul’s campaign is over. Before
the way they were treated at the district conventions, nearly all of
them planned to vote for Mitt Romney in the general election. Was Romney
their first choice? Of course not. Good luck finding a Republican that
has been all Romney all the way. Because every campaign was brought to
an end before Oregon held its primary, nearly everyone in that
room voted for Mitt Romney in the primary, even the people being
dismissively labeled “Ron Paul Supporters” by those who did not have the
votes to get into Tampa legally. What they really are
obviously is a new wave of Republican activists who were inspired by Ron
Paul’s campaign, who are now taking this movement forward as the
Republican Liberty Caucus (RLC).
The only thing they did wrong on June 23rd was win. After the first
round of voting, something mysterious happened when the ORP leadership
realized that none of their favored friends, donors, consultants, and
power brokers had won. It suddenly became very slow and difficult for
ORP officials to count the votes and report the results. For the rest of
the day all the districts began repeatedly sitting, doing nothing for
hours of down time, each being told that another district was the hold
up, this information coming from the same folks who secretly preplanned
to adjourn sharply at 5pm.
Public explanations from senior ORP officials for the delays have
themselves been so easily falsifiable with the most rudimentary fact
checking, that the smell of reasonable suspicion continued to get even
fishier.
Solomon Yue, Oregon’s RNC committeeman, has claimed the delays
were caused by CD4 when publicly available video of its entire
convention shows it was actually ahead of everyone else. During that
long delay when ORP officials were taking stock of the first round of
voting’s results, Yue claims CD4 should have voted on Electoral College
candidates during the down time. The video evidence clearly shows that
they not only did that, but CD4 elected their new district chair too,
all before getting the results of the first round of voting. They were ahead not behind.
Jeff Smith has proffered the biggest whopper of them all. He has been
claiming that CD2 delayed everyone else by three hours due to a
projector bulb going out and a long lunch break. This being so very
different from what actual CD2 attendees have told me, I probed Smith’s
claim a bit. His final answer was that the bulb stalled them between 30
to 60 minutes, and “The lunch break was nearly 2 hours because the PCP
were excused to go into local restaurants.” He was not there; he was
chairing CD1 at the time. I am not saying he just made this up. Perhaps
the person that did make it up was his source, but every person who
actually was there that I have interviewed, including its Chair “Tiny”
Robertson, has told me that CD2 had a shorter lunch than scheduled, on
the premises, because its chairman was able to provide a complimentary
lunch for them, financed by a local businessman. While it is the case a
bulb went out at around 9:30am, Robertson skillfully had his local
candidates give their live speeches while the projector was being fixed,
losing no time at all. Between Fred Dayton and Tiny Robertson, it’s
clear the ORP does have some effective leaders. But for Jeff Smith, who
has been doing his best to defend the ORP leadership’s behavior that
day, when basic fact checking gets this bad, it kind of makes one
wonder.
During these long mysteriously caused delays, Solomon Yue said
on the Bill Post Radio show, that he was very busy taking calls from
people who lost their election and in his words had their “feelings
hurt.” What were these people, powerful enough to have Solomon Yue’s
personal cell phone number, asking the ORP leadership to do about it?
With all of these obvious questions leading to an obvious answer,
Allen Alley himself managed to boast live on the Bill Post Radio Show
about what really happened in not so veiled terms. I have come to learn
that Bill Post is probably the most important radio host in this state.
While admittedly offering mostly commentary, his talented interviewing
skills have a way of bringing out facts from his guests that they would
never have offered to the main stream media. If you are not tuning in to
his show, you are missing a lot of info that the major broadcasters
miss. On July 10th, Post offered Alley a chance to explain what
happened, and this is what he said: “We have a process that was designed
many, many, many years ago um to select our delegates to the national
convention. Usually rewarding the people that have really been good ah
people who have supported the party and the party candidates um there’s
some people that spent some time trying to figure out how that process
works. Uh this has been something that has happened nationally you know
in some cases electing people that were not loyal to the person they
were pledged to. The way this works is that you pledge yourself to
Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, or Paul and ah what I think happened is we
went through our process and the process has integrity. Maybe some of
the people who were trying to do some mischief with the process ah where
not successful in doing that and ah they made a lot of noise but the
bottom line was we followed our process, we got our delegates selected,
we’re going to Tampa as a unified delegation. That’s what’s important.
We’re going to vote our votes for the people the State of Oregon told us
to vote for.”
Notice that Alley never mentions the delays. For him everything was
executed properly; the “process” worked like it was supposed to in his
view. These seats at the national convention are for “rewarding people”
as if they are the Lincoln bedroom or something. What he dismisses as
“people who were trying to do some mischief with the process” is of
course really just PCPs electing someone other than whom Alley would
like to reward, people whom, when they lost, had their feelings hurt. So
after the delegate positions were voted on without his slate winning,
somehow they managed to run out of time by 5pm, and Alley tried to shut
these conventions down before the PCPs could vote on the alternates. But
don’t worry, ORP officials chimed, the state executive committee has
the power to fill them for you – “the process has integrity” indeed.
Opinion leaders with ties to Alley then tried to spin this event as
the RLC trying to change the outcome of Oregon’s primary, but notice how
that issue is an afterthought to Alley. He is fully confident that they
are all “going to vote our votes for the people the State of Oregon
told us to vote for” when it will be mostly RLC members doing the
voting. The ORP executive committee appointed alternates, not delegates.
Alternates don’t vote; the delegates do. Of course Alley should be
confident all the delegates will honor their pledge, since those very
people he claims sought mischief have been planning to vote for the
candidate they are pledged to support all along. Indeed it has been
nothing short of slander to suggest otherwise. The controversy
surrounding these conventions has never really been about how the
delegates will vote; it has been the question of whether or not some
people are entitled to go to Tampa regardless of their ability to earn the PCP votes necessary to do so.
Let’s examine the “integrity” of this process a bit further. Under
the rules, Alley did not have the power to order these conventions to
adjourn at 5pm as he planned to do the day before they convened. Under
the rules, he is only given the power to set the time and place they
will convene not adjourn. Indeed he is given no power to set
their agenda either. So Roberts Rules of Order requires the conventions
to pass an agenda for it to be binding. Otherwise there is no agenda to
which a motion calling for the orders of the day could be made. No
convention passed the agenda that ORP officials handed out, so it was
not binding in a way that would require a 2/3rds vote to extend past
5pm.
Let’s pretend for a moment they did. The agenda that was handed out
did not even have a hard deadline. There was an asterisk next to 5pm
reminding all PCPs that it was an approximate time. This oversight on
Team Alley’s part was probably due to the use of a template from
previous years where the ORP leadership had yet to contemplate the idea
of shutting down the voting so they could appoint their friends instead.
Let’s also assume, for the sake of argument, that the variable time
on the agenda was indeed a binding hard deadline. Even then it would not
be a rule the way Allen Alley asserts, mandating each convention to
adjourn. That is why Solomon Yue has distanced himself from Alley’s
absurd position.
On the Bill Post Radio Show when asked if Chairman
Alley “had the right to adjourn the meeting at five o’clock.” Yue
responded: “Actually Roberts Rules of Order governed this portion
regarding a published deadline and it works like this: when you reach a
published deadline every chairman in the Congressional District can
adjourn the meeting. However, if you want the meeting to continue, a
PCP, a participant in the meeting must move to extend, that’s the proper
motion, move to extend. The presiding chairman must recognize
the person that makes that motion and without hesitation and also
without debate and call for a vote. It takes two-thirds of the body
present to vote affirmative to count the motion.” This is exactly what
happened in CD2 and CD4. The motion to extend was recognized and passed
with well over 2/3rds of the vote. There was not enough interest to do
so in CD1 and CD3.
In CD5 things got more interesting. Jeff Kubler, its chair, did not
recognize any motions to extend. He simply declared his convention
adjourned and left the building. His ORP liaison left soon thereafter in
the confusion with the ballots. Under Roberts Rules of Order, which ORP
convention rules make binding, the chair has to recognize a motion to
extend or the adjournment is not valid. He is even required to pause and
wait for it. Indeed Roberts is so adamant about this point, that it
explicitly says if the chair simply failed to hear someone make the
motion, he must reconvene the body: “If the chair learns, immediately
after declaring the assembly adjourned, that a member seeking the floor
for one of these purposes had risen and addressed the chair before the
adjournment was declared, then, since the adjournment was improper and
this breech was promptly noted, the chair must call the meeting back to
order.” Jeff Kubler did no such thing, but since his convention was
improperly adjourned and he left the building, his vice chair Marilyn
Shannon, who saw the motions that Kubler did not recognize, became the
chair and recognized one which passed overwhelmingly.
Supermajorities refused to adjourn, disregarding Alley’s unlawful
orders to do so. Given that the RLC made up at most 45% of the PCPs, on
their own they would not have even been able to vote down a simple
motion to adjourn. But in three conventions more that 2/3rds voted to
extend! In CD3 it was 42 to extend to 22 not to extend (two votes short
of 2/3). This goes to show it was far more than the RLC whose votes were
suppressed. There were Tea Party folks who smelled wrong doing and had
their own slate. There were social conservatives who care very deeply
about voting in a slate of delegates who will preserve the party’s
pro-life plank. Given the role that Allen Alley played in watering down
the social conservative language in our ORP platform, they were outraged
at his coup too. This was not only about the RLC; this was Allen
Alley’s blatant disregard for his own activist base, and probably the
worst thing he could have possibly done during an election year.
The three districts that legally extended met the quorum necessary to
cast valid votes for at large alternates. Neither the ORP bylaws nor
the convention rules explicitly establish a quorum, thus Robert’s Rules
of Order governs this matter too. Thankfully it is very clear: “In
meetings of a convention, unless the bylaws of the organization provide
otherwise, the quorum is a majority of the delegates who have been
registered at the convention as in attendance, irrespective of whether
some may have departed.” CD2, CD4, and CD5 as the registered PCPs “in
attendance” cast legal votes for the at large alternates “irrespective
of whether some may have departed.” Their votes needed to be counted.
The at large alternates were not vacant positions to fill. The executive
committee only had six vacancies to fill, the district alternates for
CD1 and CD3.
These rules regarding adjournment and quorum are so clear that two
new arguments have emerged to assert the invalidation of the legal votes
that were cast on alternates. The very fact the ORP leadership has to
make them further reveals what it has become under Allen Alley. First,
it is now contended that since the votes cast for at large alternates,
however valid, were done without knowing the results of the previous
round of voting so as to take the winners’ names out, they cannot be
counted. To assess the significant of this fact we must first ask, who
broke this rule? It was the ORP leadership that failed to share the
returns of the district delegate round of voting. The way in which the
ORP state staff went on strike well before 5pm presents a glaring
indication of the intentionality of all this. They had been “counting”
the previous round for several hours. No reasonable person believes they
did not have the tallies finished well before five. Then at five it was
not like “awe shucks, sorry it’s taking so long guys but we’ll stay if
you stay.”
Given Alley’s behavior before and after the conventions, it’s not
hard to imagine a scenario where every convention voted unanimously to
finish their business but Team Alley still would have run for the hills
with the hopes that the failure to remove winners’ names would
invalidate the vote. Do Oregon Republicans want their party to be an
organization where its staff cannot be relied on to do simply things
like tally votes?
Since the rules do not even explicitly state that the votes will
become invalid if the previous round’s winners’ names are not removed,
perhaps a better question to ask is on what grounds does the ORP
leadership have to even argue that the failure to remove these names
hurt its slate’s chance to win? The only people penalized by the failure
to remove these names is the caucus with THE WINNERS, and who
was winning? The liberty slate. Who stood to benefit from not removing
these names? The people who were losing, Alley’s “rewards” slate.
The other argument is similar but only regards CD5: since the ORP
staff confiscated the ballot box, the votes were not sealed in it the
way the rules require. So again the question is who broke the rule? And
again it is not the PCPs at the convention. The ORP staff at CD5 had to
violate a rule to create the condition where CD5 did not have its ballot
box – that rule being 7.3: “At the time of adjournment, all ballot
envelopes shall be placed in a box provided by the Oregon Republican
Party, sealed and signed by both the outgoing and newly elected district
chairman and delivered by the newly elected chairman to the Oregon
Republican Party Chairman within seven (7) days.” The ballot box was
taken from this convention before it adjourned. If this behavior is
allowed to stand, there are all kinds of rules the ORP leadership can
violate to invalidate the votes of its PCPs for the opportunity to
appoint its own slate.
The greatest tragedy is that the ORP leadership even has to stoop to the
level of arguing these last two points. Allen Alley has turned it into
an organization that argues it can throw out its own PCPs’ votes if it
itself taints those votes by violating a rule. My fellow Republicans
with ties to Alley need to look themselves in the mirror and ask if that
is what they want their party to be.
Since openly or privately everyone in the ORP knows what Alley did
that day, he seems to have recently realized that his best defense to
save his political future is to continue dividing the activist base,
bringing up the same slander they were spreading before the conventions
convened. Last Friday he doubled down on division, sending out an email
with several documents attached to it, demonstrating what a low priority
uniting his party to win state wide elections is to him compared to
saving his own liberal skin.
In that email he tries to rhetorically ask: “Who benefits from
messing with our process?” That’s a good question. Since Alley defined
this process as a system that distributes rewards, I suppose he cannot
even fathom how idealistic activists would value participation in
national platform writing over rubbing shoulders with the powerful.
Alley forgets it was the RLC and the other factions of activists who
followed the rules that day. It was Mr. Alley that messed this
convention up. How does he benefit? Just look at who was appointed.
Alley could be leading a united party right now, but for something as
trivial as distributing convention seats as a reward, he was willing to
intentionally undermine his own party’s cohesion in the worst of all
possible times.
Attached to Alley’s email is a forged message purporting to be from
Ron Paul supporters in Alaska written in a way to make them sound like
barbarians at the gate. The RLC in Oregon is so open sourced, why no
intercepted messages from them? Let’s pretend they actually are
barbarians in Alaska, given the fact that was not the case here
in Oregon from 9am to 5pm on June 23rd, why continue warning about the
Alaskans? Of course things have gotten rowdy since June 23rd, but that
just begs the question why did Allen Alley go out of his way hit this
beehive? Why did he pick a fight with his own party’s base?
The email also includes a memo addressed to “All Oregon Republican
PCPs,” but in the ORP that Alley has created, it was not sent out to the
more than 2,000 Republican PCPs in Oregon. Rather, just a couple
hundred of those closest to Alley got this message written by Tim Smith
that libelously claims the RLC candidates running for the office of
bound delegate and alternate did so with the intent of not honoring
their pledge. He goes further to continue spreading the rumor that they
are being funded by George Soros and a Democratic PAC. Given the circles
in which Smith and Alley float, perhaps it could be understood that it
remains completely outside their imagination to grasp that people might
passionately volunteer their time for a cause they actually believe in.
They’re not in this for the money, the status, or the power. The Oregon
Chapter of the RLC has about $140 in its bank account. They are not
running TV ads; they are not an astroturf organization. This is the very
grassroots energy the ORP has been in need of for a long time, and Team
Alley is trying to paint them as the enemy to cover up the fact he made
a terrible mistake. Republicans in Oregon need to take a good look at
what Alley has done to their party and decide if that is what they want
to be.
Eric Shierman lives in southwest Portland and is the author of A Brief History of Political Cultural Change.
Ok here's my take: I think Eric has a well written, well thought out article here. There were some serious problems at the state convention. Eric is VERY sharp and is very good at making strong points, so I agree with some of what he has written and disagree with other things. Overall, a great article. I also think this is not quite as horrendous as he and others have made it out to be and quite frankly it's "old news" now.
MOST importantly, he has pointed out (as I highlighted in the article), THE most important talk show in Oregon is: The Bill Post Radio Show!
If you are listening to anything else at noon weekdays, you are missing the big stories as well as a really big laugh daily which is what we really need most right about now isn't it? Thanks Eric!
No comments:
Post a Comment